On 8 January 2011 01:38, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I keep getting told that the "flexibility" is in the best interests of > the project, if this were true why is it more common for commercial > entities to require this, where as most other things like the linux > kernel has clearly defined principals that the project is based on.
Actually now that I think about it, I'd love pay for ring side seats to see the outcome of such "flexibility" if linux kernel contributors were made to agree to such a contract before they could upload code, so the project might have "flexibility" if contributors in future thought some other license would be better for the project and well GPL v BSD arguments of the past would look like a friendly get together. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
