>Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into >ODBL data, it can only stay cc-by-sa.
If you are legally sure and prove that they were cc-by-sa in the first place. ;<)) This copyright stuff for soft - ware (not software) is a can of worms that will kill the project in the end. This discussion is turning completely silly. What if Betty changes country and decides to reside in France -before- publicating her tiles on a server located in the Bahama's and claiming CC0 ;<))))) Gert -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com] Verzonden: zaterdag 18 juni 2011 12:36 Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions. Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap On 18 June 2011 20:26, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > Is this similar?: > > Andy, in Australia, contributes CC-By or CC-By-SA data to CC-By-SA > OpenStreetMap. Perhaps the data is Australian boundaries or > something. > Betty, in UK, creates CC-By-SA tiles that include that boundary data. > Chuck, in USA, creates vectors from those tiles and later contributes > them to OSM under CC-By-SA and CT/ODbL. > > All fair here? How would it change if Betty were in USA as well? Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into ODBL data, it can only stay cc-by-sa. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
