+1 anyway I just wanted to make clear that our current data is submitted under CC-BY-SA (at least our community members declares so) but there is absolutely no prove that the data submitted can be CC-BY-SA.
I just want to say that copyright is not just something you can declare or deny in ordinary mapmaking, let alone once is becomes a database and/or mixed with times. The discussions on this list become theoretically beyond a level an ordinary lawyer can understand, let-alone us. Gert -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com] Verzonden: zondag 19 juni 2011 6:59 Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions. Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap On 19 June 2011 03:40, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen <g.grem...@cetest.nl> wrote: > What if Betty changes country and decides to reside in France -before- > publicating > her tiles on a server located in the Bahama's and claiming CC0 > ;<))))) It's silly because some people injected a silly argument into it, but it would seem that ODBL opens up some pretty big loop holes that CC-by-SA doesn't, and we've been told time after time about how much better it is, CC-by-SA is working just fine, but ODBL won't. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
