+1 for both items On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear All, > > LWG would like feedback on a couple of items relating to cleaning > tainted data as we all prepare for the data base transition. > > Draft minutes are here. > > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1ZIQSl0xXpUFbqTeknz61BYgfCINDTzlAWomOiGxhgG8 > > Of particular interest are: > - can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position? > - is a mapper declaration of odbl=clean interesting and helpful in > reconciling the data base? > > As seen here: > > "We discussed the moving of nodes and whether they could be clean: We > have seen a concern expressed where an node is moved by an agreed > mapper and that is the last position, should it not be deemed clean > (even if created dirty)? Conclusion: Yes, we are OK with that, the > assumption being that the move is made in good faith with a reference > source, (survey, Bing imagery, …). We consider that the creation of an > object and its id to be a system action rather than individual > creative contribution. Tags on the same node must be considered > separately. The LWG would like to adopt this as policy and would be > grateful for community feedback. > > Frederik has recently proposed a new tag, odbl=clean, to be set by > mappers who will vouch for the odbl compliance of any object. The LWG > would like to adopt this as policy and would be grateful for community > feedback." > > We look forward to your thoughtful, insightful feedback. > > Best regards and Happy Mapping, > Richard Weait on behalf of LWG > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
