On 02/28/2013 05:54 AM, Jake Wasserman wrote: > I'm a little confused. The way I interpret your comment, merely > storing ODbL and non-ODbL data in the same database triggers share > alike. But on the use cases wiki page > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License/Use_Cases), Case 4 says: > 'It makes no difference whether you store the data sets separately, or > together in the same "database" software, whether that is a RDBMS, > NOSQL, filesystem or anything else. So long as the other data isn't > derived from OSM, the result is a Collective Database, not a > Derivative Database.' In other words, storing ODbL and non-ODbL data > together does not trigger share alike.
What I understand is that the difference between Derivative Database and Collective Database is whether or not the data is published under a common namespace. What storage is used does not matter. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk