Some quotes from this thread :
>Clifford, to make this very short: this is NOT acceptable. See the last board minutes. >And I'm very tired of people trying to weasel around the absolute minimal requirements we pose on reuse of OSM data. No comment on this one ... who cares if you are tired ? >The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our main remuneration. We give our data away for >free but in return, we expect to get at least a little bit of exposure, a little help in "building our brand" to >borrow some marketing speak. So, what exactly means free for you : no money only ? This is how OSM started: Not free as in beer, but... ... finish yourself (probably forgotten by most) OSM is not asking for a little bit of exposure, but for a substantial deviation of "free". One year that i did not look into this mail list, and the first topic I read today is about how difficult it is for some people to give away something and get nothing in return. Regards, Gert Gremmen, BSc Van: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch] Verzonden: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:01 PM Aan: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attribution Requirements I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so far that we want OSM attribution on "everything" :-) Am 14.01.2014 12:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > >> Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> <mailto:si...@poole.ch> : >> >> a IMHO good >> example of what we want http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/ > > > no mention of ODbL and the attribution three screens after the map (on mobile, maybe this looks different on a desktop)? > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
