On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Alex Barth <a...@mapbox.com> wrote: > I just posted a writeup on my diary on how we're attributing OpenStreetMap > at Mapbox. [ ... ] [ and from the blog ] > (c) Mapbox (c) OpenStreetMap links to https://www.mapbox.com/about/maps with > a full listing of all sources. [ ... ] > Looking > forward to feedback.
I feel that the attribution that you currently use provides insufficient recognition for OpenStreetMap. A rough equivalent would be to refer to your company or one of your products, but then link to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Commercial_OSM_Software_and_Services Your choice of attribution is probably okay based on a strict reading of the current guidance in the wiki. I feel that we should change that guidance and require a more prominent, and individualized attribution for OpenStreetMap. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk