On July 14, 2014 5:34:20 PM CEST, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: >Given that any database of geocoding results is going to be clearly >based upon the Database [OpenStreetMap], and that any interesting uses >of OSM are probably going to substantial, I don't see the definition of > >it mattering. It must be the data being substantial, not the use case.
Do we have a community definition of what is substantial? If your geocoder/reverse geocoder let's say returns a place node with all its attributes: is this substantial? This is IMHO the key question. If it's not substantial, then there are no restrictions coming from ODbL. Stephan _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
