Let's say I have a great source of Floating Car Data (FCD). I'd like to use this FCD to calculate precise weights for edges I derived from OSM. These edges will be used in an online navigation application later on. Do I need to publish these weights according to the ODbL?
In general I believe that in the next years more and more of such applications will pop up as the required FCD is increasingly easy to get. Also I believe there is a great potential in such applications. It will be just a matter of time until such applications will be more than just a marketing blurb. So it would be interesting to know what this means in an ODbL context. I do see the point, that TeleNav has contributed a lot to OSM directly and don't want to neglect that at all. I really appreciate what they did and do. Still the ODbL is the same for everyone... Best regards Henning 2015-01-07 11:30 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch>: > > Marketing != Reality > > It is just some marketing blurb to sell their product, trying to derive > what they are really doing from it is just speculation. > > We -do- know that TeleNav has added lots of stuff to OSM directly (for > example http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/28211) and/or are > providing such data to the OSM community ScoutSigns, maproulette > challenges etc. for use to improve OSM data. Which all is clearly > unproblematic, not to say very good. > > Simon > > Am 07.01.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Henning Hollburg: > > Hi, > > > > as far as I understand the community guideline the creation of a > > routable graph from the OSM data (only!) is regarded a "trivial > > transformation" that doesn't have to be published under the ODbL. > > > > I am wondering now what happens when you combine this graph with other > > (non open) data. > > > > One example is Skobbler: > > > > http://developer.skobbler.com/features#qualityMapData > > > > /"//traffic data from millions of devices is being reintegrated into our > > navigation map and routing algorithm. This means that your next route > > will take the latest turn restrictions, traffic speed, speed cameras, > > and more into consideration.//"/ > > > > some more information: > > > > > http://stevecoast.com/2014/05/19/why-openstreetmap-is-now-navigation-ready-for-people-like-you/ > > > > Doesn't this mean that this data has to be published according to the > > ODbL? If not, why? > > > > Best regards > > > > Henning > > > > > > Am 07.01.2015 um 09:51 schrieb Karel Charvat: > >> Thank you very much. I needed exactly somethink like this. > >> > >> ---------- Původní zpráva ---------- > >> Od: Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> > >> Komu: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > >> Datum: 7. 1. 2015 9:09:38 > >> Předmět: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM based GPS navigations and ODbl > >> license of OSM data > >> > >> > >> Please see > >> > >> > http://osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines_______________________________________________ > >> legal-talk mailing list > >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> legal-talk mailing list > >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > legal-talk mailing list > > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk