Come on Alex. If you accidentally publicly use a produced work or a derivative database that is linked somehow with sensitive data and if somebody actually asks you for the underlying data and if for legal (privacy) or business reasons you can't hand out the non-OSM data part (lots of ifs), you are in violation of the licence terms and you cease to have a licence for the OSM derived data in question. However you can reinstate your rights under the licence by rectifying the situation (stopping to use the data publicly), which shouldn't be an issue since, as you stipulate, the use is accidental.
Simon Am 24.09.2015 um 00:32 schrieb Alex Barth: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote: > > it might actually force > such a service provider to differentiate between geo-coding for public > vs in-house use. > > > This suggestion has come up before and I'd like to flag that this is > impractical. No organization would and should take the risk that a > potential future (accidental) publication of a private OpenStreetMap > based work could jeopardize sensitive data. The risk is significant as > even the publication of a Produced Work can bring the share alike > stipulations of the ODbL to bear. > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
