On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tom Callaway <[email protected]> wrote: > so we permit people to mark that package as simply "GPLv2+". > However, it is also correct to list out all the licenses in play > ("GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"). It is left to the packager to determine > which option they feel comfortable using.
Thanks for the clarification. That makes perfect sense. Eric _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
