legal  

Messages by Thread

• [Fedora-legal-list] License of XSD package sagitter--- via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License of XSD package Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Software origin Benson Muite via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Software origin Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Jamie Null via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] BSD-3-Clause vs CMU sagitter--- via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Cristian Le via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU sagitter--- via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Cristian Le via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Philippe Ombredanne via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Philippe Ombredanne via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Miroslav Suchý via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD-3-Clause vs CMU Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] go-tpm-tools, TCGL, and concatenated upstream LICENSE Stuart D Gathman via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: go-tpm-tools, TCGL, and concatenated upstream LICENSE Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: go-tpm-tools, TCGL, and concatenated upstream LICENSE Stuart D Gathman via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] 13yo kids contribution to Fedora project Sandro Bonazzola via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 13yo kids contribution to Fedora project David Woodhouse via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 13yo kids contribution to Fedora project Stuart D Gathman via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 13yo kids contribution to Fedora project Sandro Bonazzola via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Ben Beasley via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Michel Lind via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Relicensing controversy in python-chardet Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Chris Punches via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jamie Null via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 43 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Advice needed RE: Docs & RPM Fusion & Video Codecs & Nvidia Mat H via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Advice needed RE: Docs & RPM Fusion & Video Codecs & Nvidia Justin Wheeler via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Advice needed RE: Docs & RPM Fusion & Video Codecs & Nvidia Jilayne Lovejoy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Advice needed RE: Docs & RPM Fusion & Video Codecs & Nvidia Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Advice needed RE: Docs & RPM Fusion & Video Codecs & Nvidia Gary Buhrmaster via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose Rodolfo Olivieri via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fwd: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fwd: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose Rodolfo Olivieri via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fwd: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fwd: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose Rodolfo Olivieri via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Dolby Digital Plus (E-AC3) patents have now expired. Time to add it to fedora spaceshipgalore--- via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dolby Digital Plus (E-AC3) patents have now expired. Time to add it to fedora Gary Buhrmaster via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] How To Recover Lost Or Scammed Cryptocurrency From Scammers Visit OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIUS Dalot Martinez via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] How To Recover Lost Or Scammed Cryptocurrency From Scammers Visit OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIUS Dalot Martinez via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Máirín Duffy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Máirín Duffy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Question about two Fedora packages that are CC0 Máirín Duffy via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jerry James via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Cristian Le via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jerry James via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jerry James via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jilayne Lovejoy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jerry James via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: antlr3 and a not-allowed license Jerry James via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] CC0-1.0 in tree-sitter-clojure / tree-sitter-clojure-orchard, previously vendored into rust-difftastic Michel Lind via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Jilayne Lovejoy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Justin Wheeler via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Justin Wheeler via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Kevin Fenzi via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Michael Winters via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Privacy policy - request for clarification (Hatlas) Kevin Fenzi via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Richard W.M. Jones via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Richard W.M. Jones via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Richard W.M. Jones via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Neal Gompa via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Michel Lind via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Microsoft DevCon - OK to redistribute? Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] hashcat 7 and new software copied over Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: hashcat 7 and new software copied over Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: hashcat 7 and new software copied over Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: hashcat 7 and new software copied over Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] GPL-3.0-or-later WITH GCC-exception-2.0 Mark Wielaard via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPL-3.0-or-later WITH GCC-exception-2.0 Ben Beasley via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPL-3.0-or-later WITH GCC-exception-2.0 Mark Wielaard via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] viskores license Orion Poplawski via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: viskores license Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: viskores license Jilayne Lovejoy via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Specifying a copyright in package files while being licensed under GPL-2.0-only Pavol Sloboda via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Specifying a copyright in package files while being licensed under GPL-2.0-only Ben Beasley via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Specifying a copyright in package files while being licensed under GPL-2.0-only Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Highlightstories Andrew Hardie via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Highlightstories Andrew Hardie via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] ldraw rights concerns Benson Muite via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: ldraw rights concerns Miroslav Suchý via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: ldraw rights concerns Miro Hrončok via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: New package faad2 (AAC decoding) Gary Buhrmaster via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: New package faad2 (AAC decoding) Neal Gompa via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Creative Commons as code license Alejandro Saez Morollon via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Creative Commons as code license Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 108 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 108 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Restrictions by country of residence Benson Muite via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Restrictions by country of residence Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Sérgio Basto via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Fabio Valentini via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Sérgio Basto via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Fabio Valentini via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Miroslav Suchý via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license-validate and LicenseRef-Callaway Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] GCC license compliance question Matthew Woehlke via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GCC license compliance question Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Michel Lind via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Michel Lind via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Sérgio Basto via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Ben Beasley via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Requesting license review of 7zip (also: question about public domain review requirements) Michel Lind via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: Invitation from FSFE to Online Q&A Session about DMA & Free Software Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 123 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Properly releasing software to the public domain Jason L Tibbitts III via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Jilayne Lovejoy via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Jason L Tibbitts III via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Björn 'besser82' Esser via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Properly releasing software to the public domain Stuart D Gathman via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 127 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] [ANNOUNCE] Please join me for the 4th annual open source compliance tooling workshop FOSDEM fringe event, in Brussels, Belgium on January 31st, 2025 Philippe Ombredanne via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 161 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 224 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches Alexey Lunev via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches Alexey Lunev via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Usage of modified DUMB library with license patches Daniel P . Berrangé via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0 Fabio Valentini via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0 Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0 Fabio Valentini via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - 305 packages remaining Miroslav Suchý via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] SPDX tag for this Unicode source license Peter Lemenkov via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX tag for this Unicode source license Richard Fontana via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: SPDX tag for this Unicode source license Peter Lemenkov via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora SPDX ID for CRC32 License Ian McInerney via legal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Fedora SPDX ID for CRC32 License Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: MIT without copyright notice, requires to include the copyright notice Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] tcplay generic_xts* file licenses Ian McInerney
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: tcplay generic_xts* file licenses Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: tcplay generic_xts* file licenses Ian McInerney
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-legal-list] Licensing BIP derived files Cristian Le
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licensing BIP derived files Richard Fontana via legal
• [Fedora-legal-list] Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow? Ben Beasley
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dealing with snippets credited to StackOverflow? Omair Majid
• [Fedora-legal-list] Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Peter Lemenkov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Miroslav Suchý
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Peter Lemenkov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Fabio Valentini
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Miroslav Suchý
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Fabio Valentini
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Miroslav Suchý
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Peter Lemenkov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Daniel P . Berrangé
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field? Björn Persson

• Earlier messages