I know everyone has been really busy trying to get F20 out the door -
congrats to all involved! Now that it is officially released, anyone
willing to pick this back up?

Regards,
Jeff


On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Jeff Backus <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Tom,
>
> Below is Tuomo's response regarding the Notion license in its entirety. In
> short, he was not interested in modifying the terms of the license,
> however, he did confirm that the Notion satisfies the terms of the current
> license.
>
> So, what's next? Is there anything I can do to help the process along?
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Re: Questions Regarding the
> Ion(tm) License  Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:15:16 +0000  From: Tuomo
> Valkonen <[email protected]> <[email protected]>  To: Jeff Backus
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>
> > On 06 Dec 2013, at 12:44, Jeff Backus <[email protected]> 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dr. Valkonen,
> >
> > I know you are very busy, so I will be brief.
> >
> > I am writing to you on behalf of the Notion project, which is a fork of 
> > Ion3(tm) created in 2010. Since you have obviously moved onto bigger and 
> > better things and Ion3(tm) has not been active since 2009, we feel that the 
> > additional clauses added to the LGPL 2.1 license are no longer necessary to 
> > avoid confusion with regard to supporting unofficial versions - 
> > particularly since you have officially stated that you no longer offer 
> > support of any version. Therefore we ask that you grant permission to the 
> > Notion project to distribute as part of the Notion project any and all 
> > Ion(tm)-related material, including but not limited to primary and 
> > ancillary code and documentation, under the terms of the official LGPL 
> > version 2.1 as specified at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html.
> >
> > If you are not interested in releasing Ion(tm) under the official LGPL, 
> > either through Notion or other means, would you please at least verify that 
> > the Notion name sufficiently satisfies the Ion3(tm) license?
>
> It does.
>
> Tuomo
>
> >
> > An simple e-mailed response is sufficient for either request. I thank you 
> > in advance for your time.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Jeff
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Backus
> > [email protected]
> > http://github.com/jsbackus
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Jeff Backus
[email protected]
http://github.com/jsbackus
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal

Reply via email to