On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:14:40PM -0400, Robyn Bergeron wrote: [Ruth wrote:] > > As mentioned on the marketing list earlier, the Red Hat legal team wrote > > terms of use for us, which croberts thinks must have gotten deleted in a > > migration/upgrade. But they specify Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike > > 3.0 Unported License > > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>("CC-BY-SA"). > > Yes, and it's useful to have those published on the site so that readers > understand the terms under which can reuse/remix the content. I think Joe was > coming a bit more from the "contribution" angle, though of course the > contribute and use terms need to line up. > > So we def. need to get the terms of use back on - and make sure that we're > verifying somehow that people submitting content are aware of the license > under which they're submitting or have signed the FPCA or etc.
This is for fedoramagazine.org? (When I get a moment I'll look at the archives for the marketing list.) I see a legal note in the footer that is reminiscent of the same for opensource.com. The terms of use for opensource.com were recently revised to make CC BY-SA 4.0 the default 'Red Hat original content' license for content on that site, FWIW. One nice thing about the 4.0 license is it eliminates the need for the passive-aggressive moral rights clause waiver, but that is baked into the FPCA. The FPCA does provide for a mechanism for designating a 'Later Default License' though. The Later Default License has to be chosen from the list of currently-acceptable licenses for Fedora. - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
