On 15 April 2014 16:43, Richard Fontana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:09:02PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > > * we're not sure if deleting packages in playground would violate > > GPL (legal list CC'd and the question could be -- "Is it violation > > of GPL if we offer RPMs and SRPMs at some point and delete them > > after some time?" -- now it seems like common scenario, happening > > every day, but rather asking to be sure) > > If the RPM is available from T0 to T1, and the code in the RPM is > covered by the GPL (or other copyleft license, say), then from T0 to > T1 access to the complete corresponding source code (let's assume the > corresponding SRPM) must also be available "in the same way through > the same place". Once you delete the RPM at T1, having made the SRPM > available also in the same way through the same place from T0 to T1, > then you could delete the SRPM too. > > Assuming relatively normal Fedora-style RPMs and SRPMs of course. > > If ambassadors or another groups makes a cdrom of a playground to give out a conference.. that would affect things. I am expecting that if it does rules will need to be laid out about iso images and such.
> - RF > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
