On 07/28/2016 06:20 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
> Could you confirm that this is 2 clause BSD ("License: BSD") and that
> I just need to get the maintainers to add a LICENSE file for this to
> be ok for Fedora?This is correct. Adding the LICENSE file is a nice to have, but not a blocker, because the .py file includes the license text and the binary package will include the .py file (presumably). > Am I right that the second is MIT (Modern Style with sublicense) and > that this package would have "License: Public Domain and MIT"? Yes. Thanks for checking, ~tom == Red Hat _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
