On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 02:16:38PM -0000, Jonny Heggheim wrote: > Hi, license headers for python-libnacl[1] was missing, so I asked upstream if > they could confirm that all files were under ASL[2]. > > Upstream reply was: > > Yes, as stated in clause 5 of the Apache license all files contributed to > > this project inherit the Apache Licence unless explicitly stated otherwise. > > Do we need to get confirmation from upstream when license is ASL 2.0?
No (if I understand your question rightly) -- Fedora doesn't have any general requirement that all source files in a given package have license notices, regardless of what the license is. Richard > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399833#c3 > [2] https://github.com/saltstack/libnacl/issues/86 _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
