On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:33 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > The real reason why these things are tolerated in font licenses is > pure (historical) unacknowledged expediency. Notice that a similar > condition is in the Bitstream Vera license too. So be it.
So if the third condition is acceptable, what is the overall verdict on the license? May I package it for Fedora?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
