Thanks for your reply Tom.
Le 12/06/2017 à 22:55, Tom Callaway a écrit : > On 06/12/2017 04:44 PM, Vincent wrote: >> Good afternoon, >> >> I'm VincentS, a newbie on fedora packaging. I contact you about >> precisions on licenses for a new package. >> >> Here is the log about sources licenses. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1271137 >> >> There is different licenses for all files. We think package license must >> be GPLv2+ and MIT and CC BY-SA. >> >> Did I forget anything? What do you think about this? >> >> Thanks in advance for your reply. > Well, I haven't audited the source directly, but it looks like you have > a mix of interpreted code (Python) and compiled code (C++). Your > compiled code is LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT. The interpreted code is > GPLv2+. If they both ended up in the same package, I would say that this > is fine: > > License: GPLv2+ and MIT and CC-BY-SA > > If you wish, this is also correct: > > License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT) and CC-BY-SA > > ~tom -- VincentS GPG Key ID: 9EDE869D @ hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org Empreinte: E4F6 EFB8 E37E FD8F 2D4A EFF9 1C96 73CF 9EDE 869D _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
