IANAL, TINLA. Jason L Tibbitts III <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't tell if this is non-free or not.
Nonfree, of course. > Certainly the restrictions on sales of unmodified work and the > restriction on certain types of modifications would be problematic, > but then I can't tell if the "just don't be a dick" part is a > request or a requirement (which then contradicts the "do whatever > you like" portion). There is nothing unusual, when more specific part contradicts to more general. And there is no requirement that general permission must not end with a full stop, although that is arguably not a good style. Consider a following imaginable BSD licence, for instance: | Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without | modification, are permitted. The following conditions shall be met: | | 1. ... | 2. ... | 3. ...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
