On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > Could legal give its opinion on this bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713604 > > which is waiting since 2019. Tom added a comment saying he will disciss it > internally but no news has been posted since then
The issue here (at least the only one I'm aware of) was that the package contains WSDL files that are nominally under a license that does not meet Fedora's policy on acceptable licenses. The default conclusion here should be that the package is not acceptable for Fedora. However, if you or anyone else would like to provide an explanation of how these files are used in this package, that might support a different conclusion. I do not really have the bandwidth to look into this myself. Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
