On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:31 PM Ben Cotton <[email protected]> wrote: > Let me check with some folks on that. I'd be interested in others' > opinions, too. > > If it were a code license, that's an obvious field of use restriction, > which means we wouldn't accept it. Historically, we've permitted > non-modification content licenses. Given the relatively narrow > restriction here, I'm inclined to except it, too. After all, we *use* > Unsplash photos around the project all the time: in Fedora Magazine, > on the Flock website, etc.
Yeah, I know that pictures from unsplash.com are used in tons of places, but this is the first case I encountered where pictures that are licensed with their new custom license terms would end up an actual package - so I figured I should ask here first ... especially given the usage restrictions (though I don't think that it would apply to our use case, but obviously IANAL). Fabio _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
