On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:28:57AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:02 AM Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> wrote:


I want to point to new tool I have created license-validate. See the thread on 
devel mailing list

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/UATFWOAELVE2ZJHHYN63CRVS22FZYK5D/

Right now it contains manualy synced list of approved licenses copied from the 
wiki

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/fedora-approved-licenses.txt

And BNF grammar of allowed constructs.

This sounds like it might be similar to some of what David Cantrell's
rpm-inspect does (https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect).

Yes, it looks like this is doing the same as "rpminspect -T license"

But the problem still remains regarding the source of the approved
licenses.  Miroslav's tool is reading the wiki for the data.  I went
the other route and used the JSON file constructed at RH and then put
it in the rpminspect-data-fedora package requiring newly approved
licenses to also be added to this file:

    
https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/blob/master/licenses/fedora.json

If anything, we are seeing that the need for a central collection of
the license data in machine-readable format is needed.  :)

--
David Cantrell <[email protected]>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to