Thanks team! Just a note, not major, if you can update the " *Last Revised:* Wednesday August 19, 2020" at the top of the page as well, that would be great.
I'll be unsubscribing from the list but I'm always available via email directly if there is any follow up discussion needed. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 4:20 AM Jilayne Lovejoy <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, the wiki page is still the official list until we get the new docs > section up and running and the TOML database generating a human-readable > list there. > > Richard and I have now updated the wiki page accordingly :) > > Jilayne > > On 2/28/22 4:04 PM, Justin Zobel wrote: > > I guess as far as I understand, the Wiki page > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing would be > considered the "official" list. So if it's added to that, I'm free to use > it :) > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:21 AM Richard Fontana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:08 PM Justin Zobel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Everyone, >> > >> > Hope you all had a great weekend. >> > >> > Just following up to see if there has been an official determination on >> the inclusion of this license in Fedora's accepted license list? >> >> I am not sure if Fedora has a clear "official" process at the moment >> (though that is being worked on). I would say though: ODbL should be >> added as an approved license specifically for content, but given the >> nature of this license, it should be noted that the elements of the >> covered dataset also must be under terms acceptable to Fedora. In this >> case, the OpenStreetMap data meets that standard. >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Justin >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:20 PM Richard Fontana <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 4:01 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> [JL wrote:] >> >> > >> The only things that caught my attention in the license (other >> than length and thoroughness) are: >> >> > >> - as per section 2.3(b) the license does not cover any patents >> over the Content or the Database >> >> > >> I think this is ok, as it's similar to the CC licenses (which are >> approved) and I don't really see how patents would apply here anyway >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> [RF wrote:] >> >> > > But I guess this can be approved specifically as a content license. >> >> > > It's certainly a flawed license and I don't think it meets Fedora's >> >> > > free/open criteria in a more general sense. >> >> >> >> [JL wrote:] >> >> > so to quote your recent re-draft, it would go in the bucket of: >> >> > >> >> > 3. Licenses for Content >> >> > >> >> > “Content” means any material that is not code, documentation, fonts >> or >> >> > binary firmware. >> >> > >> >> > In addition, Fedora may designate a license as good for content if it >> >> > restricts or prohibits modification but otherwise meets the standards >> >> > for good licenses for code. >> >> >> >> Yes, but prompted by this license (and your comment on the patent >> >> issue) I'm thinking we should revise that description -- I will reply >> >> to the thread where I posted the draft category descriptions. >> >> >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > >
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
