On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 17:08, Richard Fontana <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:55 AM Iñaki Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Kind reminder that the package was accepted [1], and we are blocking on > > legal. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2072115 > > Hi, > > Unfortunately we have decided this license does not meet Fedora's > minimum standards for a free software/open source license. > > The license may continue to be tolerated for software that is > currently packaged in Fedora, but would not be allowed for future > packages.
So it's ok for OpenvSwitch I guess because it's a key technology nowadays, but not for this. [shrugs] Thanks anyway for your consideration. Iñaki > My recommendation would be to try to get the upstream developers to > switch to an OSI-approved permissive license like the MIT license. > > Richard > -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
