Hi Justin,
Are you asking for the review of these b/c there is a package to be
included in Fedora that uses these licenses?
Thanks,
Jilayne
On 6/28/22 3:57 PM, Justin W. Flory (he/him) wrote:
Hey all,
Since Creative Commons licenses are already coming up, how is the Creative
Commons IGO license family classified in Fedora?
I didn't notice these licenses in the Licenses wiki page. They are distinctly
different from other Creative Commons licenses and to the best of my knowledge,
they are not superseded by the 4.0 family of Creative Commons licenses. I
mention it here because if we are looking at other Creative Commons license
families, it would be good to clarify how Fedora views the IGO family too. For
context, some UN agencies are considering the IGO family of licenses as a
default open source license for work created by public servants, so it isn't
impossible to see CC IGO content working its way into Fedora at some point.
The key distinction made in the IGO licenses from other CC licenses is around
mediation and arbitration for resolving legal disputes.
*https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
*https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/
*https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/
*https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/
--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory (he/him) || 🔗 jwf.io
TZ=America/New_York 🕖
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, June 28th, 2022 at 15:49, Michel Alexandre
Salim<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
During the review of rust-pwd (needed as a new dependency for rust-nu-
path):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
it came to light that the upstream Rust crate declares the license to
be CC-PDDC:https://spdx.org/licenses/preview/CC-PDDC.html
The change itself happened after the previous patch release (1.3.0) and
is released in the latest 1.3.1:
https://gitlab.com/pwoolcoc/pwd/-/commit/8375b41379c6f7b2a3b7a675d6b892b27faa44fd
Two questions here:
- can we treat CC-PDDC as basically Public Domain, which is approved by
Fedora perhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
- if not, can we use the Git commit history to assume that the intent
is to make this public domain?
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities:
https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
