Hi Richard,

Thank you for looking into this.

We have discussed this internally with Intel legal folks, and as you pointed 
out earlier, those Intel signed binaries are actually built from "3-clause BSD" 
source code:
https://github.com/intel/linux-sgx/tree/master/psw/ae
https://github.com/intel/linux-sgx/tree/master/psw/ae/data/prebuilt

Given this, probably in spec file License field we should use "BSD,NetCDF" 
instead of "Redistributable, no modification permitted" for the Intel signed 
binaries?

BTW, it seems the license content for Intel signed binaries is stale. Intel SGX 
team is working on updating it.

-Yunying
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to