On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 03:23:25PM -0600, Michael Winters via legal wrote:
> Thanks for the response Kevin.  The implicit points about "legitimate
> business purposes" are exactly the sort of thing that lay people like myself
> need to understand.  And yes, everything should be made much more explicit.
> 
> One request if you have time (hah!): Any old emails or other materials you
> can dig up and share on the topic would be super helpful.

I don't think I have much. We worked on all this at a face to face
meeting (I think it was before a flock/fudcon) where we had a bunch of
people in person. There might be some notes, but I don't know that I
have them. I can ask around.

> > However, there's some semantics here: Is this a seperate project?
> > You are working on this in the context of fedora with fedora resources
> > (once the POC is done), so a good argument could be made that it's just
> > another fedora application run by fedora.
> 
> That's a great question, and I don't know the answer from a legal
> standpoint.  (Who is "in" Fedora vs. "collaborating with" vs "in
> communication with"?  If Meta makes a FAS account, are they "in" Fedora?)
> 
> There are probably only two answers: this is either a separate project, or
> it isn't.  Judging from the concerned comments I've been getting, we need to
> provide answers for both scenarios.
> 
> FYI I have generally portrayed Hatlas as "downstream" and separate mainly
> because I don't want people to feel a false sense of security with, "it's
> ok, it's an official Fedora project".  I would feel disingenuous allaying
> those concerns when the reality is that anyone else could do whatever they
> want with this data today.  (At least as far as: there are no technical
> measures preventing it, and seemingly none legal either.)

I was sort of thinking of it as a 'proof of concept out something' and
then propose it be added as a 'fedora' thing, but yeah, best to be
careful in early days for sure.

> Of course, I'd *really* like to not get sued if the obscure legalities shake
> out against me :).  So let me say again: my intention here *is* for this to
> be a POC for a Fedora project.  (With presumably a new non-"hat" name when
> it moves.)  But I think it's in the casual visitors' best interest to
> conceive of it as separate and treat it accordingly.

Sure.

> > I don't think that work can happen here, we will need to discuss it
> > with internal legal folks.
> 
> That's frustrating, but totally understandable.
> 
> Hatlas has generated just as much excitement in our CommOps community as it
> has concern outside of it.  We're able to make real progress on our goals,
> far more quickly than ever before.  And we are able to invite into the work
> those who have been previously offered to help but been stuck on the
> sidelines.

yes! Thanks for driving this forward!

> I've been holding off on adding more data to Hatlas in the hopes of quick
> answers here, but it seems clearer by the day that there are none.
> 
> In lieu of an authoritative legal response, yourself and others in Fedora
> leadership have all stated that you believe this data to be freely available
> for any purpose, and especially those serving the Fedora community.  As
> such, I plan to thread that needle of excitement and concern and try to add
> to Hatlas the highest-value subsets of data that I can, while still not
> providing the full historical dataset.  I've shared that plan and thought
> process elsewhere, but thought I'd share it here too for visibility.

ok. I will try and ask questions as I can and will let you know answers
as much and as soon as I can.

> Thanks again for your leadership Kevin.  I hope you get to sleep someday.

I have finally. Things are looking up!

kevin
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to