On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We're thinking of using the DevCon tool inside virt-v2v: > > https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/tree/main/setup/devcon > > The license on the files looks like Microsoft proprietary ("All Rights > Reserved", no other information). However the license of the > repository as a whole is MS-PL which is on the Allowed list: > > https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/blob/main/LICENSE > > So I'm really looking for an opinion on whether this is good enough > for Fedora, or if we need to get some clarification (from Microsoft?) > > This was asked about before, and not really answered clearly: > > https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/issues/60
Late to this discussion but I think it's reasonable from all this information to assume the license of the devcon files is MS-PL, particularly given this response to the issue Jilayne opened in 2016: https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/issues/60#issuecomment-286899015. as well as the maintainer's response to the SPDX-License-Identifier pull request (regardless of whether they act on that). Richard -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
