Hi, folks! I'm forwarding to this mailing list the thread resulting from the last comment received on my package review in Bugzilla ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428704#c11).
Apparently, most of the mentioned files are trivial, so I'm thinking of keeping them to facilitate the packaging work and not have to deal with removal/skipping tests. Regarding the image found in the test code, I opted to remove it to avoid future complications. Any thoughts on this? Regards, Rodolfo Olivieri. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Richard Fontana <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 4:28 PM Subject: Re: Question about licensing for data shipped with Goose To: Máirín Duffy <[email protected]> Cc: Rodolfo Olivieri <[email protected]> I didn't read the discord conversation because I couldn't authenticate with the account I apparently have and didn't want to create another one... with that caveat: - I would just assume the stuff here https://github.com/block/goose/tree/main/crates/goose-cli/src/scenario_tests/recordings is too trivial to worry about - I would assume the stuff here https://github.com/block/goose/tree/main/crates/goose-mcp/src/computercontroller/tests/data is too trivial to worry about I'd push a little with the upstream on the goose image since it's the kind of thing that you might expect a human would claim copyright on and I don't see any specific reason to assume it's AI-generated. If they say they're reasonably sure it was AI-generated then I'd take their word for it and assume it is not copyrighted. If they just don't know, I'd remove the content. Richard On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:39 PM Máirín Duffy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Richard, > > Goose ships a png file and some CSV files as part of Goose that are part > of their test suite. This came up in packaging review in Fedora as a > potential licensing issue and concerns about redistributing the content. > The Goose developers believe the content is LLM-generated but we weren't > able to get more details on its origin. > > This is the conversation with Goose upstream: > > https://discord.com/channels/1287729918100246654/1287729920319033345/1470766652315668480 > > This is the actual content in question: > > - > > https://github.com/block/goose/tree/main/crates/goose-cli/src/scenario_tests/recordings > - > > https://github.com/block/goose/tree/main/crates/goose-cli/src/scenario_tests/test_data > - > > https://github.com/block/goose/tree/main/crates/goose-mcp/src/computercontroller/tests/data > > > The bugzilla with the package reviwe and more specifics is here (points #2 > and #4): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428704#c11 > > We were wondering how you'd advise handling this - drop the content > entirely from the package, ask Goose upstream to explicitly license it > under a license you could recommend for us, or something else? > > TIA, > ~m > > Máirín "Mo" Duffy she/her/hers > > Distinguished Engineer, ⚡ RHEL Lightspeed > > Boston, MA, USA > <https://www.redhat.com/> > -- Richard Fontana IBM Legal (supporting Red Hat) -- Rodolfo Olivieri He/Him Principal Software Engineer, RHEL Lightspeed Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> [email protected] @redhatbr <https://twitter.com/redhatbr> @red-hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> @redhatbrasil <https://www.facebook.com/redhatbrasil> <https://www.redhat.com> <https://redhat.com/options>
-- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
