legal  

Messages by Thread

• [Fedora-legal-list] George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora Alexander Ploumistos
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: George Douros' fonts can no longer be packaged in Fedora Alexander Ploumistos
• [Fedora-legal-list] Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG Abhiram Kuchibhotla
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Questions about some things I'm doing for my SIG Abhiram Kuchibhotla
• [Fedora-legal-list] Paintown asssets Artur Iwicki
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Paintown asssets Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Paintown asssets Sérgio Basto
• [Fedora-legal-list] 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store Mike Simms
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store Pierre-Yves Chibon
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store R P Herrold
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: 'Fedora' app on Google Play Store Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: FSF All Permissive License for AppStream Metadata Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] CP/M license Eric Smith
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CP/M license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CP/M license Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CP/M license Eric Smith
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CP/M license Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal Peter Oliver
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal Jason L Tibbitts III
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: No activity on bug blocking FE-Legal Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Nagios Open Software License: free software? Robert-André Mauchin
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software? Jason L Tibbitts III
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software? Dmitry Alexandrov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Nagios Open Software License: free software? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Forbidden_items is not updated ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Forbidden_items is not updated ? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] BSD 2-Clause license Fernando Nasser
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Fernando Nasser
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Haïkel
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Fernando Nasser
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BSD 2-Clause license Fernando Nasser
• [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-LA statement about the last MPEG-2 patent expiration in US (February 13, 2018) Peter Lemenkov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Josh Boyer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Josh Boyer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Last U.S. MPEG-2 Patent Expires on Feb. 13th! Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-legal-list] Batch icon set license Samuel Rakitničan
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Dmitry Alexandrov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Dmitry Alexandrov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Samuel Rakitničan
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Samuel Rakitničan
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Stephen John Smoogen
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Batch icon set license Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Yaakov Selkowitz
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Zamir Sun
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ? Sérgio Basto
• [Fedora-legal-list] Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ? Igor Gnatenko
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ? Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is legal mention packages that aren't in Fedora repos ? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Ocaml documentation license Florian Weimer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Ocaml documentation license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Ocaml documentation license Florian Weimer
• [Fedora-legal-list] Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3) Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [3dprinting] Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3) Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [3dprinting] Relicensing Cura to LGPLv3+ (but is still uses AGPLv3+ and GPLv3) Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] Perfect DOS VGA 437 - is it okay to package this font? Artur Iwicki
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Perfect DOS VGA 437 - is it okay to package this font? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] EPL-2.0 license Fernando Nasser
• [Fedora-legal-list] Licensing wiki page for QPL has dead URL Randy Barlow
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licensing wiki page for QPL has dead URL Christopher Meng
• [Fedora-legal-list] JpGraph and "open source use" Randy Barlow
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: JpGraph and "open source use" Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: JpGraph and "open source use" Randy Barlow
• [Fedora-legal-list] Dealing with patented code included in tarballs Igor Gnatenko
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Dealing with patented code included in tarballs Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications? Solomon Peachy
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications? Zdenek Dohnal
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CUPS changing from GPLv2 to ASL2.0 -- implications? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Mattia Verga
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Antonio Trande
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Mattia Verga
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Antonio Trande
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Mattia Verga
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+ Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Antlr license Fernando Nasser
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Antlr license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Antlr license Fernando Nasser
• [Fedora-legal-list] CDDL 1.0 and 1.1 Fernando Nasser
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CDDL 1.0 and 1.1 Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: CDDL 1.0 and 1.1 Fernando Nasser
• [Fedora-legal-list] Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Mihai-Drosi Caju
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Mihai-Drosi Caju
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Jared K. Smith
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Stephen John Smoogen
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR? Jason L Tibbitts III
• [Fedora-legal-list] Announcement: fdk-aac Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Announcement: fdk-aac Peter Lemenkov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Announcement: fdk-aac Josh Boyer
• [Fedora-legal-list] S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Yanko Kaneti
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Adam Jackson
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Adam Jackson
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Colin Finck
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Jason L Tibbitts III
• [Fedora-legal-list] libdvdcss package in COPR Michal Novotny
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: libdvdcss package in COPR Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: libdvdcss package in COPR Michal Novotny
  • [Fedora-legal-list] COPR rules regarding ‘contrib’ (Was: libdvdcss package in COPR) Dmitry Alexandrov
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: COPR rules regarding ‘contrib’ (Was: libdvdcss package in COPR) Miroslav Suchý
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: libdvdcss package in COPR Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-legal-list] Pyramid and the Repoze license Randy Barlow
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Pyramid and the Repoze license Jason L Tibbitts III
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Pyramid and the Repoze license Randy Barlow
• [Fedora-legal-list] What's the current MPEG-1 layer 2 (mp2) encoding status? Peter Lemenkov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora Export Compliance/Customs Information Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Doubts about GPLv3+ with added clause Juan Orti Alcaine
• [Fedora-legal-list] Bison license exception Sandro Mani
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Bison license exception Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Bison license exception Sandro Mani
• [Fedora-legal-list] about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Josh Boyer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Sérgio Basto
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: about openssl we may enable and build all elliptic curves on corp ? Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Eclipse licences for fonts Peter Oliver
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Eclipse licences for fonts Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity. nisus
• [Fedora-legal-list] Good afternoon! Medication delivery. Prices are amazing. Kevin
• [Fedora-legal-list] erlang-p1_pam license change: GPLv2 --> ASL 2.0 Randy Barlow
• [Fedora-legal-list] License for data files about 3D printing materials Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [3dprinting] License for data files about 3D printing materials Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fwd: Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
• [Fedora-legal-list] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? Florian Weimer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? aconcernedfossdev
• [Fedora-legal-list] Difficulty about package license Vincent
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Difficulty about package license Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Difficulty about package license Vincent
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Difficulty about package license Laurent Rineau
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Difficulty about package license Charalampos Stratakis
• [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Pierre-Yves Chibon
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] any blockers for mjpeg based applications? James Hogarth
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: any blockers for mjpeg based applications? Tom Callaway
• [Fedora-legal-list] fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages Siddharth Sharma
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages Siddharth Sharma
• [Fedora-legal-list] Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Miro Hrončok
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Randy Barlow
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Vít Ondruch
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Jason L Tibbitts III
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention? Björn Persson
• [Fedora-legal-list] vagrant-hostmanager-1.8.6 license change: MIT → MPLv2.0 Randy Barlow
• [Fedora-legal-list] mp3 patents + encoding in Fedora Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: mp3 patents + encoding in Fedora Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-legal-list] Nil license Jitka Plesníková
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Nil license Dmitry Alexandrov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora patches License Remi Collet
• [Fedora-legal-list] BioPython license change Antonio Trande
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: BioPython license change Dmitry Alexandrov
• [Fedora-legal-list] Guidelines for publishing container images Florian Weimer
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Guidelines for publishing container images Matthew Miller
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Guidelines for publishing container images Florian Weimer
• [Fedora-legal-list] Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA? Randy Barlow
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA? Tom Callaway
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA? Richard Fontana
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA? Neal Gompa
  • [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA? Stephen John Smoogen
  • [Fedora-legal-list] FPCA for pagure.io (was: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?) Richard Fontana

• Earlier messages
• Later messages