On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:05:27 -0400, Eric wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> Chad can brag all he wants about being the only non-stock kernel with > exFAT, but he always conveniently leaves out the fact that the kernel > contains proprietary licensed Microsoft modules that cannot be > legally distributed. He's not using the open-source exFAT through > FUSE or the literally brand new open-source out-of-tree kernel module > by rxrz. ..maybe he has a license from Microsoft? ;o) Seriously, what other options are there? ..exFAT "is proprietary and patent-pending" according to both Microsoft and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT , AFAIR exFAT was designed to specifically suppress asd prevent GPL etc open source development and business on Microsoft-compatible file systems. > I refuse to deal with people who shamelessly promote warez kernels on > sites that only allow GPL-compliant binaries, convince their > followers to do the same, yet hide the binaries and the > yet-to-be-seen-yet-on-a-public-server source code in unregulated > portions of the internet where GPL enforcement can't reach. > > This whole thread was created out of spite and harassment. > > - Eric Appleman ..it looks more like Microsoft style litigation tactics. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
