On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Eric D <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI- i sent a mail to this list from Chad's account, as it seems most of my > messages are not making it through, besides the one you that was moderated > (i removed the message, as im posting this to the list as well) (Yes, I > know Chad and I am his neighbor and friend) > > So - It is ok that when someone else that has no connection to Chad is > discussed, that people be allowed to bash Chad and re-direct the topic back > to Chad. But when a clear violation is posted (sebastianfm for example) - > people from this list say they dont really care (in not so many words) > > Im sorry, but it seems as if this should be the "bash Chad mailing list" - > and It wasnt just Chad's side that spammed this list, it was Eric Appleman's > side as well. Eric Appleman still continues to post lies to this list about > Chad and access to his kernel. > > If we are going to moderate posts, lets atleast moderate the ones that have > no relevance to a legal list, such as bashing Chad...
For Christs sake, there are points on both sides, but.. Can the moderators STOP IT already? This mailinglist is for discussion of legal aspects of current and/or past GPL enforement action. Discussions about getting holders together for legal action? That's for the list. Questions? That's for the list. Attempting to defend positions on the list? NOT for the list. Good Question: "Someone's not giving me the code." Good Answer: "Try this, and if that doesn't work, email this person/other list". Bad Question: "Is Chad in compliance? Why are you picking on Chad? But your not doing anything about suchandsuch". Bad Answer: "Chad's Satan incarnate, and should be put in jail". It is ok for someone to express that they feel that ANYONE is not in compliance. It's also ok for someone to respectfully disagree. Want to talk about it? TAKE IT THE ^*^&(*^&* OFF LIST, because it turns into a religious war. -- -- Thomas
