There is certainly no reason to deny the possibility of a conspiration.But does
that lead us anywehere unless we have prove for it? Of course,imperialism will
seize on the opportunity to do what it wanted to do anyhow. But that does not
prove that they are responsible for the acts which they them instrumentalize.
Things would be much easier if all forces in the world always acted in the real
interest of their own stated aims (in this case nobody has stated any aims of
the attacks). This is a methodological problem. I tzthink we ought to fight
imperialisms actions right now and make it clear that they will not at all
contribute to make the lives of ordinary people safer.But in doing this we need
not focus on 'conspiracies' (before we can come up with any real proves).
A.Holberg
Bob Enoch schrieb:
> Carrol....Are you saying (a) that imperialism doesn't conspire? or (b) that
> they have in the past ("remember the Maine", the Tonkin Gulf resolution, the
> set-up for Desert Storm etc. etc. ) but they wouldn't do anything THIS
> gross....or (c)do you just want to be in the "mainstream", even at the cost
> of insisting that the only possible explanation is the one offered by the
> CIA-FBI-NSA-CNN? I don't know what the truth is , but, comrade, neither do
> you. If your point is that there is no use trying to convince the people of
> this, then I agree. They will not believe their state capable of this until
> they understand Imperialism .But you , and people on this list DO understand
> it, and know, or ought to know, that it is capable of anything. The
> importance of the debate is not academic but tactical... If this was a"
> Reichstag Fire", then we can expect a dramatic attempt to enhance their
> control of the oil patch , especially in Iraq, and an attack upon civil
> rights at home on a scale previously thought impossible. We might also see
> Eretz Israel in the next few months. If not, then one might look for a
> response calculated primarily to reassure the American People without
> fundamentally altering their entire Mid-East strategy....In any case, I
> cannot see how labelling those examining this very real possibility as
> "conspiracy theorists" advances our cause....or did Oswald really act alone?
> Bob Enoch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leninist-International mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
