On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Gour <g...@gour-nitai.com> wrote: > Ville> That being said, I don't see anything challenging Qt any day > Ville> soon in native space (java, c# and web toolkits are a separate > Ville> matter, and not something you can really use from CPython). Qt > Ville> is the future of Nokia, and being resourced accordingly. > > Let me say that I was considering to use GTK+ for a long time for my > Haskell project, and after short research and little encounter with > wx, decided to use Qt(haskell). 4.7 brings some very exciting stuff > and others simply do not have enough resources to compete with.
Thanks for this comment. I'll respond to you and Ville here. I don't really need a crystal ball here to write the docs. I've been privately assuming that Ville is the leading choice to be my successor. When appropriate, I'll tailor my remarks to him. Let us assume, for the sake of discussion, that Qt will be, in fact, the dominant gui for the foreseeable future, or equivalently, that Qt will be Ville's first choice of gui. The docs will attempt to explain, assuming that is true, why the various wrappers I have used still make sense. (There are a few places where it would be best to change or remove the wrappers, and I'll certainly discuss those too.) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-edi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
