On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Terry Brown <terry_n_br...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:45:49 -0500 > "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, nodes simply must have identity. For example, when I clone a >> node and move into a view tree I am, very clearly, saying that I am >> interested in *this particular* node. It would be fruitless to create >> a breakable representation of the node when we have gnx. End of >> discussion. > > Depends on use case. I use UNLs to collect nodes in 'view nodes' all > the time, and of course they're breakable, but usually they don't and > if they do it's no big deal.
I agree. My point was that identity is sometimes necessary, and so gnx's are necessary as well. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
