Have you considered working with sip instead of swig? I believe sip is deemed to be a far superior tool to swig. Sip is also what is user to create PyQt, so knowing it well could benefit Leo in interesting ways. On Sep 20, 2011 5:28 PM, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 20, 9:23 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am tempted to ignore the existing parser entirely. It's not such >> a crazy idea! All we need is a parser that allows us to create type >> tables! Writing unit tests for such a parser would be straightforward. > > There is an essential point of view that is implicit here: the parser > is simply a tool for getting unit tests to pass! If we concentrate on > unit tests that demonstrate that swig's type tables are created > correctly, we have a framework for doing intensive testing of the (new > or old) *parser*. > > In this framework, we can ask afresh the question, "what is the > simplest parser that could possibly work?" > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
