On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this will save a lot of people a lot of time, and I agree with > the implementation decisions you made (repeat dialog, no @setting). There is related issue--a borderline case imo. Leo warns in the log (in red) about orphaned nodes. A case could be made for opening a dialog for such errors. Consistency would argue for the dialog, but my hunch is that the present warnings suffice. EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
