On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:39:34 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:58 AM, <duf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As per title... are you interested in using Leo as a PIM? > > > > I use Leo for all my data-management tasks. Imo, more features would not > make Leo a substantially PIM. > > Many people seem to think that tags are essential, and perhaps Leo should > have better support for tags. Otoh, p.v.u can represent tags very easily, > and Terry surely has done a lot with tags. Just for clarity, I haven't done anything with tags and Leo in what I'd consider any common usage of the term. Or any other way, I'm not sure what you're referring to. I have worked with tags in a couple of other, non-Leo projects, and they're kind of great when they're great and fiddly when they're fiddly. But like c.executeMinibufferCommand() I'm sure they could be useful for people not wanting to get right in to the internals. Cheers -Terry > Rather than more features, I suggest people commune with Getting Things > Done. It's sure boosted my productivity. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
