On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:03:57 -0800 Matt Wilkie <map...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To my admittedly neophyte eye, the "expressed intention" of the compute > leading whitespace change is clear enough. Having just coincidentally and independently calculated indentation depth for "two-space" indented text as level = (len(line)-len(line.lstrip())) / 2 I would have to agree :) (my input was more controlled, so I could make the implied assumptions). > The significant points are a) > there is a significant performance gain (some data for that now provided), That needs to be measured in actual use though, not standalone. A 100x speed increase in a piece of code that's only responsible for 1% of the time the user spends waiting for 'X' to happen doesn't justify itself based on speed gained. Not sure how much user time expand-tabs consumes in load/save. Cheers -Terry > and b) that it is provably safe and equivalent to what it replaces (and/or > deviations documented and deemed ok). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
