It turns out that the newline is being injected by section reference expansion, and is not a problem with macros. This is handled within leoTangle.py. I do not know whether output of this newline could be prevented. Putting a "\" at the end of a line does not work because it must follow the section reference which will have already put out the newline by the time the "\" is seen. So you get
for f in xxx \ ; do .... BobS On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 9:33:14 PM UTC-6, Davy Cottet wrote: > > Your need looks similar to mine.I think as well that would be very useful > to implement. > https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/109 > > As a workaround, what if you put a " \ " when define your $1 ? Is that > possible to obtain : > > for f in xxx \ > ; do .... > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
