No, it's not. It's always been difficult for me to see what it's supposed to do. I figured it out on my own with some trial and error. Then there were issues with v5 reading earlier files (had something to do with where extra line feeds were or something). Thanks for your response, looks like I'll need to keep using @auto-rst for the foreseeable future.
Rob...... On Saturday, February 14, 2015 at 1:13:29 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Largo84 <lar...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> ...when I change my @auto-rst files to @nosent files, the resulting >> files do not contain the RST section headers that were automatically added >> by @auto-rst. >> > > Oops. Good thing 5.1 will continue support for @auto-rst! > > > My goal was to create RST style plain text files that could be easily > navigated by non-Leo editors (Android for example via Dropbox sync), then > reloaded in Leo. How is this supposed to work if I use @nosent instead? > > It looks like you've proven that @auto-rst is still useful. Thanks for > these comments. Furthermore, I'm not sure @auto-rst is properly > documented. I've put it on the list to check... > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
