On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:22 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I guess I wonder which tasks can currently only be accomplished with org > mode, and not Leo. > > I thought Leo had recently acquired support for multiple source > languages? Or are you talking about executing, not syntax highlighting? > Correct. Leo needs to support, C, C#, C++, Java, etc. > > A good table editor would be nice, it should read/write from > markdown/rst/latex/html. I suspect there's been at least one iteration of > such a thing, in the distant past. If I had an urgent need to edit tables > in Leo, I'd probably edit them in the richtext plugin (CKEditor) and script > the results to whatever format I wanted. > Thanks for this tip. Still, I think we have to follow org-mode's way on this. > > The rest of it would be easier to evaluate in terms tasks made easier / > possible. > > In terms of user base, I think we all agree Leo has multiple potential > audiences. Emacs users will very techy people, generally. > I have a bit of Jupyter envy in me :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
