On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:42:10 -0600 Terry Brown <terrynbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A reason to retain single use @ constants would be allowing users to > change things by editing a single setting, rather than having to grok > a Qt stylesheet. Although I think we can also legitimately ask if making themes tweakable by users is a goal. A lot of themeable things (browsers, desktops, mediaplayers) has large libraries of themes, but don't really support end user tweaks to those themes. Sometimes you see themes released with different versions varying only in highlight color (blue / orange / green), that sort of thing. OTOH I think we have a system sophisticated enough to make simple changes accessible to the user, so it seems a shame not to leverage that, and tweaking font sizes of individual theme elements is a good accessibility boost. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
