HI Matt - I remember a similar quote from years ago - laden with irony - I think with regard to reading email in Emacs. Which I did try but eventually abandoned. However, I think Leo's backbone of trees and nodes make much more sense of email than Emacs (but I claim no expertise in either). My main thing is there's loads of information in my emails that would be jolly handy in closer proximity to my information in Leo.
ta IH On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 22:18:07 UTC, Matt Wilkie wrote: > > > I began to wonder if having my email archive in leo would be a good thing >> - one email per node. >> > > HAHHAHAHA HEEEE heehee ho hoh! (A good belly laugh, the recognition of a > truth, not a mean derisive laugh.) > > *Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail.* > > *Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.* > > > http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/Z/Zawinskis-Law.html > > https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/150254/what-does-jamie-zawinskis-law-mean > > matt > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
