On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 12:41:47 PM UTC-5, andyjim wrote: > > > On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 9:38:53 AM UTC-5, Thomas Passin wrote: > >> >> I decided to have the link meta-lines have optional labels, because they >> help you know which links goes where. In the older paper-based system, >> identifiers generally looked like [...] >> >> Using an optional label seems better. >> > > Very much agreed. It's hard to imagine a situation where we wouldn't want > a literate label with any link, though there might be such a case. > Should/could the literate label precede the UID in the line, for prominance? >
My current code has the link id preceding its label. That's convenient for coding, and I think it looks well, too. Here's an example: :link: TomP.20200221124629.1 Zettels Having the label at the end makes it stand out more, at least to me, compared with having it embedded in the middle. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/a5aa8c49-db75-4bed-90a8-a6d89f9f6457%40googlegroups.com.
