On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 11:19:56 AM UTC-5, vitalije wrote: I doubt this would be a very good idea. Undo/redo already has a lot of > things to do. Adding some more chores to them will likely make things more > complicated, slower and probably introduce more bugs. >
Yes, what I now call robust positions would make some parts of the code more complicated. However, the undo/redo code is already complicated, and it passes many substantial tests. Only a few more unit tests would be necessary, imo. I am not interested in grand alternatives to positions. True, it's often best to recast a problem in terms of vnodes, but I can't mandate that all script writers do that. What I want is for positions to work a bit better. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/9b60950f-c3ea-4c41-a37f-49602155694ao%40googlegroups.com.
