> My candidates for closing without action are 855, 1625, 1673, 2033, 2111, > 2301.
I'm leaving #1673 active (why is each package in the book). The general idea behind it still stands. Then again, the book can *always* provide more rationale on why things are done, so this ticket may never actually get closed but rather become project mandate. A ticket isn't the right location, but for now it serves as a reminder to deal with it later in a more appropriate manner. #2033 (initramfs) isn't a bad idea actually. We'll have to discuss in due time if it should belong in the book, a hint or elsewhere. I'm leaving it also active as to serve as a reminder to re-discuss the whole matter later on. > The others (1682, 1929, 1955, 2196, 2232) should be moved to 7.0. Agreed on those and processed accordingly. > The only one left is #2094 Add a new section for build results. That should > just be marked fixed as it is addressed in 4.6: About the Test Suites. Is it adequately addressed though? I know the ticket talks about different architectures which isn't exactly applicable to LFS. I assume with the book's section you refer to, you mean the last paragraph where it talks about build-logs? Those build-logs date back to November 2005. I'd call that outdated compared to the book's current contents and package versions. Maybe this bug ought to be marked as 'invalid' (for LFS purposes) and replaced with a new ticket that addresses section 4.6 being outdated. Can you just confirm if I understood you correctly? Gerard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
