El Jueves, 26 de Mayo de 2005 22:11, Archaic escribió: > On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > After spending some time on the "reboot" section, I think it's a mistake > > to include any of that extra stuff in the book. Esp. when it still seems > > that more will be taking the chroot path anyway. > > Exactly what I was saying...
I see two different issues here. One is to build the temp tools in one machine using they to boot the target machine and build then the final system. IMHO, there is few (or none) cases where that will be actually required. The other is to reboot the current machine using the temp tools to build the final system, instead to chroot. That look like a good way to build, for example, a 64 bits O.S from a 32 bits host O.S. Then, for me to have a "reboot" way is fine, but try to support "build in one machine to boot other machine" into the book is a bad idea. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
