Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Perhaps we should have a note in the glibc instructions that libiconv
should not be installed since it is incompatible with glibc. CCing
lfs-dev for their consideration.
Well, I'm still sitting firmly on the fence with this one :) Do we know
roughly how many packages might cause one to think that libiconv is
required? Here's how I currently see it:
Arguments for warning in LFS:
1. Glibc is installed in LFS
Arguments against warning in LFS:
1. All affected packages are outside LFS
2. The warning in LFS may have been forgotten about by the time someone
comes to install an affected package.
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
